#DMTBeautySpot #beauty

The annual Women’s March, which first occurred in January 2017 as a response to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, this year held its fourth demonstration in Washington D.C., as well as several other major cities including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and more. Protesters were, however, disappointed to learn that the National Archives censored signs that were critical of, or mentioned Trump in a display that included photos from the 2017 marches. In addition, the agency also blurred signs that referenced women’s anatomy, The Washington Post reports. 

One photo that censored protest signs is a Getty photo taken by Mario Tama at the 2017 Women’s March. In it, a 1913 black-and-white image is blurred into a 2017 image on Pennsylvania Avenue as the viewer changes perspective. The photo was part of an exhibit celebrating the Women’s suffrage movement. 

National Archives spokesperson Miriam Kleiman explained the reasoning behind the censorship in an emailed statement to The Washington Post.  

“As a non-partisan, non-political federal agency, we blurred references to the president’s name on some posters, so as not to engage in current political controversy,” said Kleiman. “Our mission is to safeguard and provide access to the nation’s most important federal records, and our exhibits are one way in which we connect the American people to those records. Modifying the image was an attempt on our part to keep the focus on the records.”

In response to the censorship, many Women’s March attendees took to Twitter to speak out against the practice. 

“Hey National Archives, blur this,” said one person.

Hey, National Archives, blur this:#WomensMarch pic.twitter.com/nzfGp79euO

— Andrea Wolfson (@andrea_wolfson) January 18, 2020

“If the National Archives wants to blur Women’s March images critical of Trump, let me make it clear: 1. This was my sign. 2. It was specifically directed at Trump’s pussy grabbing; and 3. I plan to live a long time to remind everyone of it,” said another person who attended the march.

If the National Archives wants to blur Women’s March images critical of Trump, let me make it clear:

1. This was my sign.

2. It was specifically directed at Trump’s pussy grabbing; and

3. I plan to live a long time to remind everyone of it#NationalArchives #WomensMarch pic.twitter.com/hL2EK9SdFs

— Josephine (@steelsnowflake1) January 18, 2020

“This is intensely distressing to me. It is not the job of the National Archives to alter our history and make it less ‘political’. Our history *is* political,” said another protester.

This is intensely distressing to me.

It is not the job of the National Archives to alter our history and make it less "political".

Our history *is* political. https://t.co/IfyQlCz5US

— Tiffany Bond (I) 🎱🦞🇺🇸 (@TiffanyBond) January 18, 2020

The Women’s March also responded to the censorship on Twitter, emphasizing the importance of preserving the history of all marginalized people.

“Say WHAT? We cannot afford to protect the very man who pushes women of color, femmes, indigenous women and so many more to the margins of history. We march tomorrow to preserve the history of the many, not just the elite few.”

Say WHAT?

We cannot afford to protect the very man who pushes women of color, femmes, indigenous women and so many more to the margins of history.

We march tomorrow to preserve the history of the many, not just the elite few. #WomensMarch2020 https://t.co/KwscxXHOIX

— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 18, 2020

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

These Women's March Signs Are Marvelous

Gun Rights Extremists Are Rallying In Virginia

Karlie Kloss Won't Be Voting For Trump In 2020

DMTBeautySpot

via https://www.DMTBeautySpot.com

Tara Edwards, Khareem Sudlow